Search for: All records

Abstract: The two main approaches in interpreting the significance of non-radial fossil echinoderms (carpoids) have consistently produced the same two distinct clusters of results for over a century of investigation. Studies based on conceptual models imbued with Haeckelian precepts consider bilaterally symmetric or asymmetric morphologies of carpoids plesiomorphic for the phylum. These approaches do not find a place for carpoids within an existing phylogenetic framework for the phylum because it is assumed that they primitively lack pentaradiality. Emphasis on differences between these taxa and pentaradial echinoderms forces them outside of and downward from more crownward clades. It is crucial to examine the data supporting these supposed differences. Is it worth considering non-pentaradial echinoderms as members of a well-known group of echinoderms, the blastozoans, which already includes many secondarily-derived, non-pentaradial members? Followers of an empirical model think so, presenting an integration of paleontology, embryology, body wall homology, and image analysis that derives echinoderms from a bilaterian, archimeric larva, not bilateral adults. Unprecedented modification of a single mesocoel (hydrocoel) initiated the pentaradial adult echinoderm, most parsimoniously with five primary lobes in stem forms of each major clade within the phylum. The unique water vascular system led to rearrangement of adult axes that literally have no parallel with those of any other invertebrate, representing an iconic synapomorphy for the Echinodermata. There are few, if any, developmental or stratigraphic data defending carpoids as 'bilateral precursors'. Their free appendage is now shown to be an ambulacrum, undermining any supposition of a 'head', 'tail', or 'gill slits'. Pentaradiality is plesiomorphic for the phylum, obviating the requirement for a triradial intermediate (helicoplacoids) between carpoids and pentaradial forms. Carpoids, a subset of blastozoans, exploited motility as a feeding mode, leading to extraordinary adaptations that belie their interpretation as ancestral echinoderms. 

Abstract: Echinoderms are so highly derived compared with other deuterostomes, including their sister group, hemichordates, that comparisons of body plans are sometimes accompanied by points of view enjoying varying levels of morphological, paleontological, and especially, embryological support. No echinoderm taxon has been the subject of more contentious debate than the carpoids, a disparate assemblage of non-pentaradial, flattened echinoderms that includes the Cincta, Ctenocystoidea, Soluta, and Stylophora. Because of their unusual morphologies, the phylogenetic position and significance of carpoids concerning the origins of the Echinodermata are still being evaluated. A detailed review of carpoid research over the past century and a half reveals that the debate largely results from methodological issues employing two basic, but very different models. Conceptual models, usually imbued with Haeckelian principles, consider the absence of a single character (pentaradial symmetry) as a recapitulation of the pre-metamorphic larval stage of echinoderms, forcing unusual taxa that also lack pentaradiality down the phylum's phylogenetic tree. Such scenarios assume that first echinoderms had a bilaterian-type anterior-posterior axis. Empirical models rely on comparison of non-pentaradial early forms with a wide array of data obtained from extant and fossil echinoderms. These data support a view in which larval morphologies of echinoderms are not represented in the fossil record of echinoderms, and that pentaradial symmetry was secondarily lost in carpoids, just as it was in many other coeval types of echinoderms.